Sign in to confirm you’re not a bot
This helps protect our community. Learn more

Trump v. Hawaii [SCOTUSbrief]

The Federalist Society
103K subscribers
<__slot-el>
<__slot-el>
54K views 7 years ago
In 1965, Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act, granting to the president the power to restrict immigration. But how far does this power extend? Amy Howe of SCOTUSblog examines Trump v. Hawaii, the upcoming Supreme Court case that will explore the limits of the president’s powers. JUDGMENT: June 26, 2018. Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts. Justices Kennedy and Thomas filed concurring opinions. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. HOLDING: The president has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under §1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions... ********** As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular political or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speaker. Learn mor …...more
...more
Trump v. Hawaii [SCOTUSbrief]
143Likes
54,966Views
2018Apr 18
In 1965, Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act, granting to the president the power to restrict immigration. But how far does this power extend? Amy Howe of SCOTUSblog examines Trump v. Hawaii, the upcoming Supreme Court case that will explore the limits of the president’s powers. JUDGMENT: June 26, 2018. Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts. Justices Kennedy and Thomas filed concurring opinions. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. HOLDING: The president has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under §1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions... ********** As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular political or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speaker. Learn more about Amy Howe: http://amylhowe.com/ Follow Amy Howe on Twitter: @AHoweBlogger   / ahoweblogger   Differing Views: Josh Blackman’s Blog: The Travel Ban, Article II, and the Nondelegation Doctrine http://joshblackman.com/blog/2018/02/... The Volokh Conspiracy: Constitutional Law Scholars' Amicus Brief in the Travel Ban 3.0 Case Explains Why the Bill of Rights Restricts Federal Power over Immigration https://reason.com/volokh/2018/04/02/... The Hill: Dershowitz: Why the Supreme Court will uphold Trump's travel ban http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog... The Atlantic: The Dangerous Precedent Set by Judicial Attacks on Trump's Travel Ban https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/... The Economist: Donald Trump’s travel ban heads back to the Supreme Court https://www.economist.com/blogs/democ... The Hill: Exactly how much immigration authority does Trump have? Well… http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog... The Atlantic: The Supreme Court’s Travel Ban Dilemma https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/... The Hill: The Supreme Court must strike down Trump immigration ban http://thehill.com/opinion/immigratio...

Follow along using the transcript.

The Federalist Society

103K subscribers