Learn more
These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Savior Generals: How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lost - From Ancient Greece to Iraq Kindle Edition
"Victor Davis Hanson has written another outstanding and eye-opening book"--The Washington Examiner
Leading military historian Victor Davis Hanson returns to non-fiction in The Savior Generals, a set of brilliantly executed pocket biographies of five generals who single-handedly saved their nations from defeat in war. War is rarely a predictable enterprise--it is a mess of luck, chance, and incalculable variables. Today's sure winner can easily become tomorrow's doomed loser. Sudden, sharp changes in fortune can reverse the course of war.
These intractable circumstances are sometimes mastered by leaders of genius--asked at the eleventh hour to save a hopeless conflict, created by others, often unpopular with politics and the public.
These savior generals often come from outside the established power structure, employ radical strategies, and flame out quickly. Their careers often end in controversy. But their dramatic feats of leadership are vital slices of history--not merely as stirring military narrative, but as lessons on the dynamic nature of consensus, leadership, and destiny.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBloomsbury Press
- Publication dateMay 14, 2013
- File size7.4 MB

Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
Review
“Mr. Hanson's fluency with a broad range of historical epochs, which has made him one of his generation's most notable historians, is on full display in ‘The Savior Generals.'” ―Mark Moyar, Wall Street Journal
“It is not really news that Victor Davis Hanson has written another outstanding and eye-opening book. He has done that before and repeatedly, on a variety of subjects.” ―Washington Examiner
“An instructive series of portraits of five military outsiders called in to turn defeat into victory.” ―Kirkus Reviews
“An engaging book in which the action on the battlefield is placed within a larger perspective of the politics and the societies that go to war, and the qualities of the generals who fight those battles.” ―John E. McIntyre, The Baltimore Sun
“Students of military leadership will be intrigued by Hanson's astute set of cases.” ―Booklist
“Great summer reading…In The Savior Generals, credit is given where it's due.” ―Weekly Standard
“Provides widely applicable insight regarding the dynamics of leadership and consensus, and how those dynamics can change the destiny of nations.” ―Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
“Victor Davis Hanson has written another good book for a wide variety of audiences.” ―New York Journal of Books
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Savior Generals
How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lostfrom Ancient Greece to Iraq
By VICTOR DAVIS HANSONBLOOMSBURY PRESS
Copyright ©2013 Victor Davis HansonAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-60819-163-5
Contents
Prologue: Saving Lost Wars.................................................1Chapter One. Athens Is Burning Themistocles at Salamis—September 480B.C........................................................................8Chapter Two. Byzantium at the Brink The Fireman Flavius Belisarius—A.D.
527–59.....................................................................49Chapter Tree. "Atlanta Is Ours and Fairly Won" William Tecumseh Sherman's
Gift to Abraham Lincoln—Summer 1864........................................96Chapter Four. One Hundred Days in Korea Matthew Ridgway Takes Over—Winter
1950–51....................................................................140Chapter Five. Iraq Is "Lost" David Petraeus and the Surge in Iraq—January
2007–May 2008..............................................................190Epilogue: A Rare Breed.....................................................238Acknowledgments............................................................251Notes......................................................................253Bibliography...............................................................289Index......................................................................297
Excerpt
CHAPTER 1
Athens Is Burning
Themistocles at Salamis—September 480 B.C.
Athens Aflame (September 480 B.C.)
The "Violet-crowned" Athens of legend was in flames. It no longer existedas a Greek city. How, the Athenians lamented, could their vibrantdemocracy simply end like this—emptied of its citizens, occupied by thePersian king Xerxes, and now torched? How had the centuries-old polisof Theseus and Solon, with its majestic Acropolis, now in just a fewSeptember days been overwhelmed by tens of thousands of Persianmarauders—enemies that the Athenians had slaughtered just ten yearsearlier at Marathon?
News had come suddenly this late summer to the once hopefulAthenians that the last-ditch Hellenic defense, eighty-five miles awayat the pass of Thermopylae—the final gateway from the north intoGreece—had evaporated. A Spartan king was dead. There were no Greekland forces left to block the rapid advance of the more than a quartermillion Persian sailors and infantry southward into central Greece.The Greek fleet at Artemisium was fleeing southward to Athens andthe Peloponnese. Far more numerous Persian warships followed in hotpursuit. Nearly all of the northern Greek city-states, including the importantnearby city of Thebes, had joined the enemy. Now the residentsof a defenseless Athens—on a desperate motion in the assembly oftheir firebrand admiral Themistocles—faced only bad and worsechoices, and scrambled in panic to abandon their centuries-old city toKing Xerxes.
Desperate Athenians rowed in boats over to the nearby islands or thenorthern coast of the Peloponnese. Anyone who stayed behind in the lostcity would meet the fate of the Spartans and Thespians at Thermopylae—killedto the last man. It was as if the great Athenian infantry victory atMarathon that turned back the first Persian invasion a decade earlierhad never occurred—like the French who lost their country in May 1940to the Germans despite the valor of Verdun a generation earlier. All ofGreece was to be the westernmost satrapy of an angry Xerxes' ascendantPersia that now for the first time incorporated European land into itsempire. Athens—and everything north of it—was already Persian. Thewar seemed, for practical purposes, almost over, with only some moppingup of the crippled and squabbling Greek fleet at Salamis.
The ensuing mass flight of Athenians was a landmark moment in thehistory of Greece. Centuries later, the Roman-era biographer Plutarch,who in his own times could not conceive of Asians in Europe rather thanEuropeans controlling Asia, summed up the Athenian panic and the decisionto forgo a last glorious land battle with the brief obituary: "The wholecity of Athens had gone out to sea." But what exactly did that mean? Coulda Greek polis—traditionally defined concretely by its locale, monuments,and landed patrimony—survive in name only without a home? ManyGreeks could not conceive of handing over their shrines and tombs oftheir ancestors to the enemy without even a fight. That is, until the popularleader Themistocles had convinced them all that they had no choice but toleave. Only that way would the gods fight on the Athenian side and eventuallygive them victory and what was left of their charred city back.
Soon almost all the fighting-age resident males—perhaps as many asthirty thousand to forty thousand Athenian citizens—had abandonedthe city to man its fleet of triremes off Salamis. More than a quarter millionelderly, women, and children had sought safety outside Attica, oneof the largest transfers of population in the ancient world. In their haste,the despondent Athenians abandoned some of the ill and aged in the cityor left them to their own devices out in the Attic countryside. Meanwhile,well over a hundred thousand Athenian civilians would crowdacross the bay from the city to the rocky island of Salamis. They weregambling that their own seamen, along with still unconquered Greek alliesfrom the Peloponnese, could wreck the Persian fleet before they allstarved—and before the onset of autumn.
There was little help from anywhere. None of the dwindling numberof surviving but terrified large Greek states to the south—Argos, Corinth,Sparta—on the other side of the Isthmus of Corinth wished to send arelief force to its likely destruction on the Attic plain. The Greeks of AsiaMinor were on the side of Xerxes, those in southern Italy and Sicily toodistant to offer help—had they been willing. Apparently the remainingfree Greeks to the south would write the Athenians off as an extinct raceas they looked to their own defenses, or found some sort of accommodationwith Persians. Most were still terrified by the news that King Xerxes'Persians, hot after the Greeks retreating from Thermopylae, had arrivedin Attica to level Athens and demonstrate a similar fate waiting for othercity-states to the south. The Persian king was becoming legendary, aforce that could not be stopped by man or god; and in fact Xerxes wasthe first Asian invader to reach this far south into Europe in the long historyof the Greeks—and he would be the last to do so in force until theOttoman Turks entered Athens in 1458, nearly two millennia later.
Inside the empty city, the occupying Persians began the laborious taskof destroying the stone shrines and temples and torching homes. Theyquickly finished off a few Athenian holdouts still barricaded on theAcropolis. Meanwhile Xerxes drew up his fleet nearby at the Athenianharbor of Phaleron. The Persians' war to annex Greece was now in a sensealmost over. There was only the Megarid and the Peloponnese to thesouth left to occupy and the easy task of mopping up the retreating Greekships and refugees trapped on Salamis.
The king himself ostentatiously perched his throne on Mount Aigaleosoutside the city. He was eager to watch the final destruction below ofwhat remained of the Greek fleet in the straits of Salamis, if the retreatingGreeks could even be shamed into rowing out. Surely Xerxes' firingof Athens should have been an insult to all the Greeks, one that mightincite some sort of last gasp of resistance. Or perhaps the humiliatedAthenians, like most of the other disheartened Greeks up north, wouldsimply just give up and wisely join the winners. If he could not cut offthe head of another Spartan king, as he had done weeks earlier to Leonidasat Thermopylae, perhaps Xerxes could at least impale a Greek admiralor two.
For six months, Xerxes had enjoyed momentum and glory, like all ofhistory's grand invaders. Their huge spring and summer expeditions atfirst rolled out with little resistance—always admiring their own magnitude,never worrying much about the unseen and surely inferior enemyto come. The legions that joined Napoleon's invasion force in summer1812 sang as they headed out for Czarist Russia, hardly imagining thatmost would die there. The imperial German army that nearly surroundedParis in August and September 1914 had no thought of a Verdunon the horizon. Hitler's Wehrmacht that plowed through the SovietUnion in June 1941 with thoughts of storming the Kremlin by Augustlost not only the theater, but the war as well. Amid such grand ambitions,few commanders wonder how to feed such hordes as supply lineslengthen, the enemy stiffens, the army loses men to attrition and the requirementsof their occupations, the terrain changes, and the fair weatherof summer descends into a crueler autumn and winter in a far distanthostile country.
Likewise, few in Xerxes' horde that crossed the Hellespont in Aprilimagined what a distant September would bring. One side or the otherinevitably would suffer enormous losses that would shake the foundationof their societies for decades after, given the magnitude of forcesand the logistical challenges in play. Xerxes had transported tens ofthousands of sailors and infantry nearly five hundred miles from hiswestern capital at Sardis into southern Europe. He had successfullycrossed from Asia Minor to Europe by constructing at Abydos an enormouslyexpensive cabled pontoon bridge over the Hellespont—all on thegamble of being able to feed his forces in part from conquered or alliedterritory. His army and navy were not merely bent on punishing theGreeks in battle, but rather on absorbing the Greek people into the PersianEmpire. What was left of the collective Greek defense rested uponfewer than 370 ships from little more than twenty city-states, about halfthe size of Xerxes' imperial fleet in the bay of Phaleron a few miles distant.Most of the assembled Greek admirals were already distraught atthe idea of being blockaded by the Persians in the small harbors aroundSalamis. Nearly all commanders were resigned to retreat even further,fifty miles southward to the Isthmus at Corinth to join the last Greek resistanceon land. Indeed, ten thousand Peloponnesians were franticallyworking there on a cross-isthmus wall as the Greeks bickered at Salamis.The historian Herodotus—who was a boy of four or five when Xerxesinvaded—believed from his informants that many in the Greek alliancehad already decided on a withdrawal from the proposed battle. France in1940 or Kuwait in 1990 had at least kept their defeated peoples insidetheir occupied cities. But the conquered city of Athens was both takenover by the enemy and also emptied of its own residents. Unlike otherdefeated Greek city-states that "Medized" (became like Persians) andwere governed by Persian overlords, the Athenians who fought at Salamisfaced a different, existential choice: either win or cease to exist as apeople.
At the final meeting of the allied generals before the battle to discussthe collective defense of what was left of Greece, one Greek delegate bellowedthat the Athenian Themistocles simply had no legitimacy. Afterall, the admiral no longer had a city to represent—a charge similar tothat often leveled later in the Second World War against General Charlesde Gaulle and his orphaned "free" French forces based in London.The Peloponnesian and island allies saw little point in fighting for anabandoned city. The overall allied fleet commander, the exasperatedSpartan Eurybiades, in a furious debate with Themistocles, next threatenedto physically strike some sense into the stubborn, cityless admiral.No matter: Themistocles supposedly screamed back, "Strike—butlisten!"
Eurybiades, who had far fewer ships under his own command, heardout the desperate Themistocles. He was well aware that the Athenianinfantry generals who had won the battle of Marathon a decade earlier—Miltiades,Callimachus, Aristides—were either dead, exiled, or withoutthe expertise to conduct naval operations. Likewise, his pessimisticSpartan antagonist also knew that three earlier efforts to stop the Persiansto the north had all failed. Why should Salamis end any differently?
In fairness to the Spartan, Eurybiades' reluctance to join Themistoclesin fighting here had a certain logic. King Leonidas had been killed atThermopylae just a few days earlier. No more than twenty-two city-statesremained to fight at Salamis, out of a near one thousand Greek poleisthat had been free a few months earlier. Moreover, the Greek fleet dependedlargely on the contributions of just three key powers, the city-statesAegina, Corinth, and Athens. Their ships made up well over halfthe armada. It seemed wiser for those admirals to retreat back to theIsthmus at Corinth and not to waste precious triremes far from home indefense of a lost city.
Worse still for the coalition, the sea powers Corinth and Aegina werehistorical rivals—and yet both in turn were enemies of the Athenians.The Greeks may have claimed that they were united by a common language,religion, and culture, the Persians divided by dozens of tonguesand races; but Xerxes presided over a coercive empire whose obedientsubjects understood the wages of dissent, while the Greek generals representeddozens of autonomous and bickering political entities whofaced no punishment should they quit the alliance and go home. Even intheir moment of crisis, these free spirits seemed to have hated each otheralmost as much as they did the Persians, who had thousands of subservientIonian Greeks in their service and had shown singular brilliance inbringing such a huge force from Asia and battering away the Greek resistanceat Tempe, Thermopylae, and Artemisium while peeling off morecity-states to their own side than were left with the resistance. Indeed,until Salamis, Xerxes had conducted one of the most successful invasionsin history.
The salvation of Athenian civilization rested solely on the vision of asingle firebrand, one who was widely despised, often considered a half-breedforeigner, an uncouth commoner as well, who had previouslyfailed twice up north at Tempe and Artemisium to stop Xerxes' advance.How well Themistocles argued to the Greek admirals determinedwhether tens of thousands would live, die, or become permanent refugeesor slaves in the next few days. Themistocles had earlier gone up anddown the shores of Salamis rallying the terrified Athenians, and he keptassuring Eurybiades and the demoralized Greeks that they must fight atSalamis to save Hellenic civilization and could assuredly win. He pointedout that the Greeks could do more than just repel the enemy armada andreclaim the Greek mainland. By defeating the Persian navy, they couldtrap Xerxes' land forces and then bring the war back home to Persianshores. Yet to the Peloponnesians, who were about ready to sail away fromSalamis, this vision of the stateless Themistocles seemed unhinged—orperhaps typical of a lowborn scoundrel who throve in the shoutingmatches of Athenian democracy but otherwise had no clue how to stopan enemy fleet three times the size of their own.
But was Themistocles wrong? He alone of the generals amid the panicfathomed enemy weaknesses that were numerous. He might have failedto save his city from burning, but he still had confidence he could savewhat was left of Athens from the Persians. Hundreds of thousands ofXerxes' army were far from home. The year was waning. And they weregetting farther each day from the supply bases in Asia Minor and northernGreece—even as the army was forced to leave ever more garrisonsto the rear to ensure conquered Greeks stayed conquered. The tippingpoint, when the overreaching attackers could be attacked, would be righthere at Salamis.
Yet the general, and admiral of the fleet, was no wild-eyed blowhard.In his midforties, Themistocles had already fought at Marathon (490),conducted a successful retreat from the failed defense line at Tempe(480), battled the larger enemy fleet to a draw at Artemisium, and thisyear marshaled the largest Athenian fleet in the city's history. In the lastdecade, he knew enough of war with Persians to have good cause for hisconfidence that logistics favored the Greeks.
Nearly a hundred supply ships had to arrive daily just to feed the Persianhorde—given that the summer's grain crops of Attica, and those ofmost of Greece, were long ago harvested. The Persian fleet was withoutpermanent safe harbors as the autumn storm season loomed and alreadyhad suffered terribly from the gales at Artemisium. In late September,rowing on the Aegean began to turn unpredictable. Rough seas were agreater danger to the Persians than to Greek triremes that still had homeports down the coast. Moreover, most of the king's contingents were notPersian. Those subject states—many of them Greek-speaking—for alltheir present obedience, still hated the Persian king as much as they didthe free Greeks of the mainland. The Persian navy proved even moremotley than the polyglot imperial army.
Most of Xerxes' army also had been camped out on campaign formonths. For all its pretense of being an imperial expeditionary force, thevarious allies would be squabbling more the farther they were fromhome, while the remaining Greeks grew more desperate for unity themore their homeland shrank in size. So far from joining the general despondency,Themistocles was supremely confident in the Greeks' chancesat Salamis. Few others shared his optimism, perhaps because a Spartanking had just fallen in battle at Thermopylae, partly because unlike Themistoclesthey still had homes to retreat to for a while longer.
Themistocles was soon to be proved right: The Spartan supreme commanderEurybiades did not realize it, but the Persian fleet had, except fora sortie to nearby Megara, already reached its furthest penetration intoEurope. Logistics, morale, and numbers had already conspired againstXerxes—even as he boasted of his conquest of Greece. Yet right now inlate September 480, few could see it: "We Athenians have given up, it istrue, our houses and city walls," Themistocles declared to the waveringgenerals, "because we did not choose to become enslaved for the sake ofthings that have no life or soul. But what we still possess is the greatestcity in all Greece—our two hundred warships that are ready now to defendyou—if you are still willing to be saved by them."
Themistocles talked of Greeks being "saved," not merely "defended,"as if a victory at Salamis would be a turning point after which Xerxescould not win. Note further that Themistocles was making a novel argumentto his fellow Greeks: A city-state was people, not just a place orbuildings. His "free" Athenians with their two hundred ships were verymuch a polis still, even if the Acropolis was blackened with fire. As longas there were thousands of scattered but free-spirited Athenians willingto fight for their liberty, so Themistocles argued, there was most certainlystill an Athens.
What swung the argument to make a stand at Salamis was not just thelogic of Themistocles, but also unexpected help from his former rival,the conservative statesman Aristides, who advised the other Greek generalsto fight. The latter's reputation for sobriety reassured the Greeksthat the Persians really were in their ships and poised for attack—andthey believed the prior messages from Themistocles himself that theyhad better attack before the Greeks got away. Time had run out. Onlythree choices were left—fight, flee, or surrender.
The Marathon Moment (August 490 B.C.)
What brought the squabbling Greeks to Salamis was a decadelong Persianeffort to destroy Hellenic freedom—and the efforts of Athenians tostop Darius and his son, Xerxes.
(Continues...)Excerpted from The Savior Generals by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON. Copyright © 2013 by Victor Davis Hanson. Excerpted by permission of BLOOMSBURY PRESS.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- ASIN : B00CHHTJBK
- Publisher : Bloomsbury Press
- Accessibility : Learn more
- Publication date : May 14, 2013
- Edition : 1st
- Language : English
- File size : 7.4 MB
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 321 pages
- ISBN-13 : 978-1608193639
- Page Flip : Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #121,500 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #8 in Military Policy (Kindle Store)
- #17 in Korean War History (Books)
- #38 in Iraq War History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow in military history and classics at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and a professor emeritus of classics at California State University, Fresno. He is the author of over two dozen books, including The Second World Wars, The Dying Citizen, and The End of Everything. He lives in Selma, California.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find this book to be a brilliant history lesson that provides great insights and is superbly researched. Moreover, the pacing is well-written and engaging, with one customer describing it as a "thoroughly readable account of genius in action." Additionally, they appreciate its timely strategies and battles, with one review highlighting how it shows how a good general can turn defeat into victory. However, the storytelling receives mixed reactions, with several customers noting that the narrative is stilted.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book informative and well-researched, describing it as a brilliant military history read.
"...If you've never read VDH before, this book is a great introduction and if you are already a fan, you will once again enjoy Victor's clear and well..." Read more
"...The book is solidly researched but he lacks the storytelling mastery of Rick Atkinson (The Guns at Last Light)...." Read more
"Professor Hanson gives great grounded perspective when writing about these generals. I will not ruin the book...." Read more
"More than merely informative, this book reminds the reader how often the challenges and characteristics of leadership are similarly surfaced in..." Read more
Customers find the pacing of the book excellent, describing it as well-written and readable, with one customer noting it's a thorough account of genius in action.
"...The book is well bound, the lettering is good sized and easy to read and the content is very enjoyable...." Read more
"...I will not ruin the book. Great easily digestible and well written book. Thank you Professor. I always enjoy your reading." Read more
"...He kept it crisp and concise and very interesting to read. You will learn a lot and that is always a good thing...." Read more
"...Hands-on writes with accessible eloquence. He is a pleasure to read simply for his facility with the English language...." Read more
Customers find the book engaging and thrilling, with fascinating topical content and great stories, and one customer notes it provides endless opportunities for further reading.
"...Petraeus was an interesting read for me as well because although I was certainly living through that time (2007 - 2008) I did not know much about..." Read more
"...Nevertheless, this is a fascinating work with great insights. The footnotes, often with excellent bibliographical references are outstanding" Read more
"...points and insights that are unique to him, thought-provoking and fascinating. Highly recommended brain food." Read more
"...Still, a worthwhile idea to pursue: can one peson make all the difference between winning a war and losing one?..." Read more
Customers find the book enjoyable.
"...bound, the lettering is good sized and easy to read and the content is very enjoyable...." Read more
"...Moreover, this book, as are his columns online, are both enjoyable and entertaining to the armchair historian...." Read more
"...but the narrative that the author weaved was very engaging and entertaining, making the various generals seem much more vivid and real than..." Read more
"Engaging and well-written account of the generals we turn to when all seems lost. These contrarians get the call after conventional wisdom fails...." Read more
Customers appreciate the timeframe of the book, with one noting its quick pace, another highlighting its timely strategies, and a third mentioning its careful planning.
"...You did not get lost in the pages. He kept it crisp and concise and very interesting to read...." Read more
"...; general, we see that a single great man can, by dilligence, careful planning, and perseverance, rescue a war or even a nation on the brink of..." Read more
"...Easily approachable, and digested." Read more
"A simple, yet thorough overview of some of history’s finest war leaders, their well-placed and timely strategies, and what separates them from the..." Read more
Customers appreciate the battles described in the book, with one review highlighting how generals can turn defeat into victory.
"...before their famous battle or campaign, then the events surrounding the battle or campaign and then what happened to these generals after their..." Read more
"...from different cultures and times who all shared the ability to turn defeat into victory...." Read more
"...Great review of the Greek and Persian strife and other battles. More info on Korea that I have ever been exposed to." Read more
"...Excellent summation of the premise. A good general wins battles, a great general wins the war." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the storytelling in the book, with several noting that the narrative is stilted.
"The author does a great service in selecting and interpreting history and historical figures...." Read more
"...The book is solidly researched but he lacks the storytelling mastery of Rick Atkinson (The Guns at Last Light)...." Read more
"...Very much enjoyed! Great review of the Greek and Persian strife and other battles. More info on Korea that I have ever been exposed to." Read more
"I loved this book. The parallels that characterized these Generals are remarkable!! You will love it. It’s a quick read." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2025Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseThis is a great book and really fun to read. as it's based on 5 different individuals and over a period of over 2000 years, it covers a lot of ground in short but very informative 45-50 pages sections. You can pick and chouse which General you want to read about first, second etc as they are each their own individual histories but VDH does link aspects of each of them to one another.
If you've never read VDH before, this book is a great introduction and if you are already a fan, you will once again enjoy Victor's clear and well researched writing. The book is well bound, the lettering is good sized and easy to read and the content is very enjoyable. I recommend it to anyone who wants an insight into why some can succeed where most would likely fail and the type of mind and composure that allows for that.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2013Format: KindleVerified PurchaseVictor Hanson writes about military generals who stepped up to "save the day" when all appeared lost. The book is solidly researched but he lacks the storytelling mastery of Rick Atkinson (The Guns at Last Light). Hanson tells five stories from 480 BC to present day. The first stories, about Thermistocles and Belisarius, are hard to follow simply because the various names(cities, regions, countries, rulers, etc.) of the time are not readily familiar. Illustrations and maps would have been helpful. The middle story about Civil War general William Sherman is not bad. But the stories about Matthew Ridgway and David Petraeus connect immediately and alone worth the price of the book.
How General Matthew Ridgway turned the Korean Conflict around has been unfortunately lost in studies about leadership and military strategy. Hanson captures the man, the dire situation, and difficult circumstances that Ridgway had to navigate. Likewise, Hanson brings out the difficult political scene General Patraeus faced during the surge that finally broke Al Qaeda's back in 2007. There are sections of the book that politicians such as Joe Biden and John Kerry would just as soon we forget. A little like the Korean Conflict, the positive ending to the Iraq War was overshadowed by the US political campaign in 2008 and Patraeus never quite reaches the pinnacle one might have expected for such a stunning accomplishment.
My main criticism of the book is that it isn't as exciting as it should be because Hanson tends to skip around among pre-battle, battle, and post-battle information. He never builds the stories to crescendos (where finishing each with an epilogue would have been terrific). Each savior general falls from grace in some manner following their particular moment of glory. I was disappointed in the one epilogue he did provide. He could have discussed common points about how generals were ready when called, what qualities they possessed to reverse the dire situations they faced, and how each dealt with fame and glory after victory. He tries to provide some common characteristics possessed by savior generals but is not convincing in connecting these ideas back to the stories in meaningful ways.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2024Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseProfessor Hanson gives great grounded perspective when writing about these generals. I will not ruin the book. Great easily digestible and well written book. Thank you Professor. I always enjoy your reading.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 27, 2024Format: PaperbackVerified Purchasegift for husband
- Reviewed in the United States on September 10, 2024Format: KindleVerified PurchaseMore than merely informative, this book reminds the reader how often the challenges and characteristics of leadership are similarly surfaced in times of crisis.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 17, 2018Format: KindleVerified PurchaseI learned a lot from this book. In particular Matthew Ridgway and David Petraeus. With each of the five generals Hanson gives you the background of the general before their famous battle or campaign, then the events surrounding the battle or campaign and then what happened to these generals after their famous action. He keeps it tight and pithy but still gives you a lot of information surrounding five really interesting characters.
For me the most knowledge gaining read was about Ridgway. I know almost nothing about the Korean war and those times and so that was really an interesting read for me. He covered the politics of the early 50's, how the US almost got thrown out of Korea and how this character, Ridgway, who was at a cocktail party in D.C. got tagged and overnight landed up in Korea as the key field commander their having to deal with an army that was in full retreat. Yet in 90 days he turned it around and replaced MacArthur in Japan. I had no idea how bad the situation was. My only understanding was that no one likes to talk about the Korean war.
Petraeus was an interesting read for me as well because although I was certainly living through that time (2007 - 2008) I did not know much about the general and of course current politics blurred actual events. No matter how you feel about the war in Iraq this is an informational read about how we got there and what the Surge was all about.
Hanson's write up on all five generals was really done very well. You did not get lost in the pages. He kept it crisp and concise and very interesting to read. You will learn a lot and that is always a good thing.
There is not moralizing in the book, no politics. Just the players, how they developed, how the battles developed and what happened to them afterwards. Great read.
Top reviews from other countries
-
ALCPReviewed in Brazil on September 23, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseUm dos meus livros favoritos, uma lição de vida sobre como competência supera dificuldades e ao mesmo tempo atrai inveja e injustiças. Os 5 generais retratados jamais tiveram o reconhecimento que mereciam e pagaram caro por ter mais habilidades no campo de batalha do que no campo político.
- Gerald R BlairReviewed in Canada on September 19, 2024
5.0 out of 5 stars leadership at the brink
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseI related more to Korea and Iraq because they were more recent conflicts. I am furious when politicians and media kick good leaders to the curb whenever the crisis has been averted. I would like to see the writer write a book about Afghanistan
- chris brownReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 31, 2024
5.0 out of 5 stars Good book
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseA good read, good service, decent price. Many thanks
-
globalistReviewed in Japan on July 10, 2013
5.0 out of 5 stars 戦略とリーダーシップ
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase名著です。外国勢に負け苦境にあえぐ経営者が学ぶべきことも多いでしょう。日露戦争の乃木大将と児玉大将が入るとよりわかりやすかったかもしれません。アメリカ南北戦争のグラント将軍や朝鮮動乱のマッカーサーの弱みを余すところなく明らかにしている。そして、戦争の目的と戦略を明らかにしたうえで、リーダーシップを発揮したシャーマンやリッジウエイの生き方を学ぶべきだろう。多国籍軍のような連合体がこれからも増えると思うが、その指揮官のやり方はM&Aの寄せ集め企業の経営に参考になる。
- EmileReviewed in Germany on June 14, 2020
5.0 out of 5 stars I am impressed
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseI am impressed by this book. Now I think that the subject of the book is somewhat far-fetched. Finding a common denominator for the generals who lived in times centuries apart is, in my opinion, stretching things a little. But that doesn't mean that what the writer has written has no value at all.
On the contrary. Although the stories on each of the generals are (necessarily) short (they are after all no biographies), they nevertheless give the exact information on what each general did to turn things around. I think that that is impressive. Reading the book, it became clear to me that the writer must have an extensive knowledge on the lives of these generals. And then be able to tell their stories concisely and clearly is truly (and I say it again) impressive.