Whoever convinced most Democrats that Putin hacked the election tallies is doing Putin’s bidding

.

On Sunday, the Daily Caller’s Peter Hasson highlighted the nation’s deep partisan delusion. He did so by pointing to a new poll which suggests that a supermajority of Democrats believe Russia changed vote tallies in order to get Donald Trump elected.


Conducted by the respected pollster, YouGov, the poll is alarming for two reasons.

First, because as Hasson notes, there is no evidence to suggest that the Russians actually tampered with any voting tallies. While Russia’s GRU intelligence service did access state voter registries, there is no evidence — at least that I have seen — to indicate voter selections were altered. It’s a lot easier to hack a state government portal and access voter registration lists than it is to change a tally without being detected. Moreover, even the Russians would be reluctant to attempt such an effort in light of the risks of detection and ensuing retaliation.

But the polling data also shows that of those respondents who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, 28 percent believe it is “definitely true” that Russia messed with the voter tallies. Though a minority portion of the responses, 28 percent is a sizable portion of the electorate. By my calculations, if applied to all Clinton voters in 2016, that 28 percent return would represent 18.4 million people! In my mind, this reflects the triumph of anger and arrogance over introspection and fact.

Of course, it’s not just liberals who have a problem here. A different YouGov poll from 2017 suggested that 45 percent of Trump voters would support judicial action to shut down media outlets that post “biased” stories. Such action is patently unconstitutional and antithetical to the nation’s ideals; still, as with those Democrats who believe Trump benefited from Russian vote tampering, it reflects the choice of anger over the national interest.

Regardless, this is just the latest proof that partisanship rots the heart and soul of otherwise good citizens. But for Vladimir Putin, whose overriding objective is the degradation of American power via the diminishing of American civic society, the polls will be welcome news.

How do you evaluate the impact of political leadership in managing California's wildfire situation?

Poll ends in 2 days • Vote below
  • Highly effective in coordinating a comprehensive response
  • Somewhat effective but lacking in long-term planning
  • Ineffective due to bureaucratic challenges
  • Counterproductive, leading to missed opportunities for prevention and response improvement
3973 votes
2 comments
v.11.1.6

Related Content