Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Language

Speech Is Not Violence

"Claiming that kind of victimhood gives them a sense of belonging, of togetherness."

John Stossel | 7.21.2021 12:23 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Webp.net-resizeimage (6) | Stossel TV
John Stossel interviews John McWhorter (Stossel TV)

Have you noticed how our language is changing?

At a congressional hearing on "Birthing While Black," nearly every politician used the words "birthing people" instead of "women" or "mothers." Asked why, Shalanda Young, President Joe Biden's budget director, said, "Our language needs to be more inclusive."

Activists have also changed "equality" to "equity" and "affirmative action" to "diversity."

The Associated Press no longer uses "mistress." It tells reporters to use "companion, friend, or lover."

Worse, certain speech is now labeled "violence."

Calling a transgender woman a man is "an act of violence," says transgender actress Laverne Cox.

Last week, the American Booksellers Association apologized for promoting a book on gender dysphoria after activists called it "anti-trans." The book is hardly "anti-trans." The Economist and the Times of London called it one of the best books of the year. But the Booksellers Association actually groveled, calling promoting the book "violent."

Tim Sandefur of the Goldwater Institute says it's dangerous to call words violence.

"The only way human beings can deal with one another is through language, discussion, debate," he says in my new video. "If we say that that's violence, then the only way for us to relate to one another is through power."

I push back. "You're white. Why should anybody listen to you about this?"

"Because what I say has, or doesn't have, merit on its own," he replies. "A big problem with the social justice movement is the idea that people's mindset is controlled by their skin color. That may be called 'anti-racism' today, but it's just plain old-fashioned racism."

Linguist John McWhorter, author of the forthcoming book Woke Racism, adds, "It can be really hard for us to talk to each other, because we don't know what the words we're using mean."

"The idea is, wherever there are white and black disparities, we're supposed to call that phenomenon 'racism,'" says McWhorter. "It never fully holds together."

"Latinx" is another new term created by activists.

And yet, says Sandefur, "'Latino' originated as a reaction led by Hispanic people! They chose the word Latino or Latina. And now here's a largely white, middle-class movement of social justice activists telling other people, 'No, no, you can't make distinctions in gender that way.'"

"Largely white?" I ask.

"The social justice movement in general is a largely white, upper-middle-class, college-educated movement," he replies. "You hardly find anybody in the Hispanic community who prefers the term 'Latinx.'"

He's right. Only 4 percent of Hispanics prefer the term.

It's hard to keep up with what's OK and what's forbidden.

Students at the University of Illinois-Chicago recently became upset because law professor Jason Kilborn included the N word, with only the first letter shown, in an exam on employment discrimination. He'd used the same word in exams for 10 years.

But this year, one student said she "had to seek counsel immediately after the exam to calm myself."

McWhorter says those students are lying. Why?

"Claiming that kind of victimhood gives them a sense of belonging, of togetherness, a sense that they're contributing to a struggle that their ancestors dealt with in a more concrete way."

The students demanded the professor be punished. He was. The law school suspended him in the name of "social justice."

"Social justice seeks to redistribute wealth and power between groups to suit what some political authority thinks is the right outcome," says Sandefur.

I push back. "Social justice just means it's time to pay attention to the minorities who never got justice."

"No," he responds. "Social justice [says], 'We're going to reorganize how people live their lives, silence some groups that have been heard more often.'"

It's as if America is moving toward 1984, George Orwell's novel, in which government controls people's thoughts by creating a new language, Newspeak.

The only way to stop it, says McWhorter, is to push back.

"Enlightened America needs to develop a backbone and start getting used to being called racist on Twitter. Just withstand it. Keep their voices out there. Make us understand what true justice is."

COPYRIGHT 2021 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Biden Is Trying to Impose Online Censorship by Proxy

John Stossel is the host and creator of Stossel TV.

LanguageCultureCulture WarSocial JusticeViolence
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (73)

Latest

Farmers Need Free Markets, Not Tariffs and Welfare

Steven Greenhut | 5.23.2025 7:30 AM

With REAL ID, America Now Has National ID Cards and Internal Passports

J.D. Tuccille | 5.23.2025 7:00 AM

Review: The Free Market Comes to The Sims 4

Autumn Billings | From the June 2025 issue

Review: Was Charles Manson Carrying Out a CIA Experiment?

Brian Doherty | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Parking Violation

Charles Oliver | 5.23.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!

Notifications