Buy new:
-39% $11.00$11.00
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$9.25$9.25
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: BooksMaxxing

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Weed Agency: A Comic Tale of Federal Bureaucracy Without Limits Paperback – June 3, 2014
Purchase options and add-ons
The little-known USDA Agency of Invasive Species—founded by President and humble peanut farmer Jimmy Carter—would like to reassure you that they rank among the most effective and cost-efficient offices within the sprawling federal bureaucracy. For decades, under Administrative Director Adam Humphrey and his “strategic disengagement” approach, the Agency has epitomized vigilance against the clear and present danger of noxious weeds. Humphrey’s record of triumphant inertia faces only two obstacles. The first is reality; the second is the loud critic who dares to question the magic behind the Agency’s success: Nicholas Bader. Formerly known as President Reagan’s “bloody right hand,” Bader is on an obsessive quest to trim the fat from the federal budget.
Full of oddball characters who shed light on the daily operations of Beltway minions, The Weed Agency showcasesa world in which federal budgets balloon every year, where a career can be built upon the skill of rationalizing astronomical expenses, and where the word "accountability" sends roars of laughter through DC office buildings. That’s life inside the federal Agency of Invasive Species… and it may sound suspiciously similar to your reality.
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJune 3, 2014
- Dimensions5.19 x 0.62 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100770436528
- ISBN-13978-0770436520
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A conservative comic romp through the toughest corridors of federal bureaucracy….a fun glimpse into the fake-but-accurate world of bureaucratic infighting.” - Jake Tapper, Author of The Outpost
“The Weed Agency brilliantly captures the absurdity of the real Washington. It is, as they say, funny because it's true.” – Jonah Goldberg, Author of The Tyranny of Clichés
"Geraghty captures the hilarious realities of Washington waste brilliantly. And we all need to laugh at Washington to stop from crying." –S.E.Cupp, author of Losing Our Religion and CNN Host
"Jim Geraghty absolutely nails it. You’ll want to believe this book is fiction, but in your heart you know so much of it – too much of it – is all too hilariously real." - Brad Thor, #1 New York Times bestselling author of Hidden Order
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
February 1981
U.S. National Debt: $950 billion
Budget, USDA Agency of Invasive Species: $20.2 million
Jack Wilkins knew he was about to witness history: In the long history of budgetary fights, Adam Humphrey vs. Nicholas Bader was going to be the clash of the titans: Otto von Bismarck vs. Genghis Khan.
At stake was nothing less than the existence of the federal agency that employed Wilkins and Humphrey, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agency of Invasive Species. President Jimmy Carter established the agency, dedicated to protecting American agriculture and gardens from the menace of invasive weeds, just four years earlier, and it stood out as a most likely target for cuts.
Humphrey’s official title at the agency was abbreviated as “USDA DFS BARM A-IS AD,”1 but as the administrative director, the highest-ranking non-appointed position, agency employees considered him the only man within the agency who actually knew what was going on.
And yet, as the two men sat in Humphrey’s office in the U.S. Department of Agriculture building in Washington, Wilkins found his boss oddly quiet and almost too confident.
“We have a week to save our jobs,” Wilkins emphasized. He wasn’t surprised that his boss didn’t share his panic--Humphrey was legendarily unflappable--but unnerved that his boss seemed so engrossed by the articles about the incoming Reagan administration’s budget hawks that he seemed oblivious to the notion that their own jobs were among those they would try to cut.
“I thought that Gergen, Stockman, and the other barbarians coming in with the president would give us more time, but they just called and asked us to meet with Nick Bader Monday morning.” Wilkins exhaled. “Of all the folks we could deal with, Bader’s the worst. ‘Nick the Knife.’ ‘Big, Bad Bader.’ ”
Like most of Washington, Wilkins thought that “President Ronald Reagan” was a fanciful, silly notion that the electorate would never actually indulge as an experiment. But the 1980 election hadn’t even been that close, and now the early days of the administration revealed an even more unthinkable development: Reagan and his team hadn’t merely been talking about cutting the government; they were putting together a budget that would actually do it. The twenty-six-year-old Wilkins had jumped to the high-ranking assistant administrator position at the federal agency after reaching early burnout in the Carter White House, and now what he had been assured was a remarkably safe civil service job felt precarious.
Humphrey was only a decade older than Wilkins but the difference felt generational. Unlike Wilkins’s deepening anxiety, Humphrey shrugged off the incoming administration’s pledge to cut wherever possible; he had recently tried to reassure his younger assistant that those who pledge to uproot bureaucracy are among those most likely to succumb to it. He pointed out that the president arrived in Washington with forty-eight separate task forces assigned to assist in the effort to reorganize the government, with more than 450 eager minds, mouths, and egos involved. The overall government-cutting bible of the merry band, Mandate for Leadership, published by the Heritage Foundation, was a 1,093-page book that represented the work of twenty task forces with three hundred participants, some of whom overlapped with Reagan’s task forces.2 The president’s inner circle selected the dangerous right-winger David Gergen to set up the president’s Initial Actions Project with a forty-ninepage report laying out the plan to not get distracted in his first year in office.
Despite Humphrey’s quiet, inexplicable confidence, the Reagan team moved quickly and his little kingdom--a federal agency assigned the silly-sounding duty of ensuring the nation’s safety from invasive weeds--stood out, glaringly, high on the list of potential cuts.
The decisive meeting with the administration loomed a week away, with every expectation that the session would end with the administration announcing its intent to eliminate the Agency of Invasive Species entirely.
Wilkins had hoped the meetings would be with someone reasonable, someone like David Stockman, the congressman who was leaving the Hill to become Reagan’s new head of the White House Office of Management and Budget. Instead . . .
Bader.
No name struck more fear into the hearts of government employees than the newly named Special Assistant to the President for Budgetary Discipline Nicholas Bader. Among federal employees, Bader was deemed slightly more threatening and evil than Charles Manson. Bader was jealous of Stockman’s reputation as the administration’s most fearsome axman, and shortly after a Newsweek cover piece on Stockman, Bader cooperated with a Time profile on himself that called him, “Reagan’s bloody right hand, always grasping a meat cleaver and craving the chance to cut deeper and faster.” The accompanying caricature portrayed him as Jack the Ripper.
In a heavy-handed symbolism rarely found outside Herblock cartoons, slain women labeled with various government agencies’ three-letter acronyms were depicted lying at Bader’s feet as his head was thrown back, roaring with laughter. The comparison didn’t bother Bader in the slightest; he joked that the cartoonist intended the comparison of government agencies to prostitutes.
A Time’s reporter asked Bader what, if any, government spending was legitimate and necessary. The pugnacious Reaganite instantly and easily replied that at this moment in American history, all government resources should be refocused upon the threat of the Soviet Union, now on the march in Afghanistan and who knows where next.
One week later, Wilkins felt even less assured about the upcoming budget battle, and Humphrey’s mysterious confidence continued unabated. They met at the agency offices in the Department of Agriculture building at 14th Street and Independence Avenue, then grabbed a cab for the short ride to Bader’s lair in the Old Executive Office Building. Humphrey never walked in winter.
On the cab’s radio, Pat Benatar dared her suitors to demonstrate their marksmanship.
“So the plan is, what, Adam, hypnotize him?” asked Wilkins, fidgeting with the handle on his briefcase.
“Relax, Jack,” Humphrey instructed. “Bader feeds off of anxiety, and if you show weakness, suggest any concession, he will pounce. He will begin with bluster and an attempt to demonstrate dominance to set the tone of the meeting, like a great ape beating his chest. Ignore it all and appear unimpressed. Let me do the talking. And concur with anything I say.”
Wilkins nodded, and nervously cracked his knuckles.
Bader himself drove in from the Virginia suburbs. Despite his reputation as part of the Reaganite preppie vanguard, he had a soft spot for pop music. British rockers singing about one after another biting the dust put him in the appropriately ruthless mood for the workday.
He drummed the steering wheel and wiggled his tush to the beat in the driver’s seat, amusing the occasional commuter in the next lane. Next to the perpetually sunny president, Bader enjoyed his job more than anyone else in Washington.
The grandson of German immigrants, Bader grew up in Queens, New York, in a thoroughly middle-class lifestyle, the son of an accountant father and aspiring entrepreneurial mother.
Young Nick had learned to give his father, Reynard P. Bader, CPA, a wide berth from about mid-January to mid-April. Life returned to its relaxed and warm tone after the last of those who had filed extensions had submitted their paperwork. Mastering the ever-more-complicated tax code, coupled with the unpleasant news of telling other people how much they owed, tended to make Reynard short-tempered and prone to lengthy diatribes about individual and corporate minimum taxes, the alternative minimum tax, and the antifamily implications of the marriage penalty instituted by the Tax Reform Act of 1969.
Nick’s mother, Helena, spent much of his childhood running a struggling catering business; if the business cycle wasn’t squeezing her, some city health inspector or rule triggered some other headache. The Bader family dinner table conversations were full of lamentations and fury over the tax code and federal, state, and city regulations of every kind, and they cultivated a righteous indignation in the son.
Perfect math SAT scores had gotten him into Princeton University with a brief Naval ROTC stint. He worked on the Hill until jumping on Reagan’s bandwagon in 1976 and again in 1980. Now, he was not even thirty and working in the White House--or so he liked to say, even though technically he worked in the Old Executive Office Building.
Throughout the first weeks of the new administration, Bader prepared what he called Reagan’s “naughty list” of government programs and agencies to be zeroed out in the upcoming year’s budget proposal. A strange sense of honor and diligence drove him to look his foes in the eye as he broke the news. That sense of honor didn’t go so far as to actually sympathize with the individuals whose jobs he aimed to eliminate; he considered most of the people before him to be parasites sucking on the national treasury. In a world where the Soviets were on the march in Afghanistan, the federal government was spending many times an average American’s annual income on inane, pointless expenditures, such as $525,000 to convert 7 percent of the U.S. Coast Guard’s personnel files to microfiche.3
Bader saw himself as righting the scales and unleashing a bit of holy wrath upon those who arrogantly assumed the American taxpayer would always pay whatever Washington demanded. He daydreamed of firing them all, but the civil service system made it nearly impossible to fire anyone, and removing the threat of termination had a predictable impact on many government workers’ sense of accountability and work ethic.
Joining the White House team made Bader feel slightly hypocritical, as he would have to fill out all the forms and become one of those government employees--albeit, he assured himself, temporarily. The public sector--roughly eighty-one million Americans, once you counted everyone receiving one form of public assistance or another--had to be paid for by the seventy million Americans working in the private sector.4 Sure, government employees would quickly insist that they paid taxes too--but all of the money that constituted their salaries originally came from tax dollars taken from the private sector.
A government cannot raise money by taxing its own spending. All of the money has to come from somewhere else, and that somewhere else was either the private sector or borrowing. In this dilemma, Bader breathed slightly easier, knowing that as president, Reagan was going to draw a hard line on deficit spending.
When he contemplated the injustice of it all, and the callousness with which the federal bureaucracy greeted every April 16, Bader couldn’t help but secretly feel a tinge of satisfaction at the tears and fury that greeted each meeting’s bad news. One distraught EPA administrator had actually opened a window and stepped out onto the ledge, threatening to jump, after one meeting discussing cuts to environmental enforcement; Bader dealt with the potential brouhaha by circulating an internal memo outlining new security measures for windows and ledges.5
Today’s meeting appeared particularly sweet to Bader: Somehow President Carter had been conned into creating a separate federal agency whose sole duty was monitoring and combating weeds. On paper, wiping this agency off the bureaucratic flowchart would be among his easiest and most satisfying. But breaking the news to Adam Humphrey would be a particularly delicious moment, as the small subculture of budget hawks on Capitol Hill had considered Humphrey to be a Svengali of appropriations fights. Bader knew a few bits of his background: Harvard undergrad, then Georgetown Law. He had been the legislative counsel to both House and Senate committees. His reputation was impressive but strangely vague--besides his negotiation skills, few knew much about him.
Bader smiled as he parked the car. Adam Humphrey and the Agency of Invasive Species would, too, bite the dust.
Bader awaited them in a conference room within the Old Executive Office Building. On his second day on the job, he had noticed that each leg of the chairs had an adjustable screw-peg at the bottom for balance, and had adjusted the chairs so that the ones on the visitors’ side of the room were a quarter-inch shorter than the chairs on his side. Bader sat behind a conference table, flanked by two silent, stone-faced, square-jawed aides. He liked to think of them as the office assistant version of the Secret Service.
“Good morning, Mr. Bader!” Humphrey practically burst with good cheer upon entering the room. “Thank you so much for taking time out of your busy schedule to give us the opportunity to further illuminate the services this agency provides to the American people.”
Bader didn’t rise to greet him, but merely nodded.
“You can dispense with the pleasantries, Humphrey.” He shot a sphincter-tightening smile at Wilkins and declared, “Sucking up to me isn’t going to make me like your pathetic joke of an agency.”
Humphrey’s smile didn’t budge. He gave a quick glance at Wilkins, as if to say, “See, right on schedule.” He subtly made a fist and softly thumped his chest. Wilkins bit his tongue to avoid laughing as they sat down.
“Mr. Bader, you have no idea how difficult it has been to work here in Washington, within the federal workforce, and yearn for that new sheriff to establish that new order. Indeed, I was greatly reassured to see our new era of fiscal rectitude ushered in with the most expensive inauguration festivities in American history.”
“Chalk that up to our predecessor’s bang-up job on containing inflation,” Bader snapped. “There’s a new sheriff in town, and the attitude toward those who waste taxpayers’ money is to hang ’em high.”
Neither of Bader’s aides had said a word after their terse introductions, but at this moment, for a split second, the one on the right pantomimed choking on a noose and smiled.
“We’ve got a lot of suspects to round up. Did you know this government spent more than a billion dollars on new furniture in the past ten years? At the same time, we’ve got seventy-eight--I counted--federally owned warehouses in the Washington area, storing piles upon piles of unused furniture, some wrapped in the original plastic.”6
This was a monologue of righteous rage that Bader had rehearsed and performed in all of these meetings, and he enjoyed each one of them. He rose and strode to the window.
“You can see waste right outside this window. In July of 1979, they repaved the sidewalk outside the West Wing offices on the White House grounds. Twice. In one month!”7
He strode back to the table, walking behind Humphrey and Wilkins.
1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Department of Farm Services, Bureau of Agricultural Risk Management, Agency of Invasive Species, Administrative Director.
2. Steven Hayward, The Age of Reagan, p. 47.
3. Editorial, “Fleeced Again,” Wilmington Morning Star, April 24, 1980.
4. Ronald Reagan’s radio commentary on “Government Cost,” November 16, 1976. Whether or not these figures are accurate, Reagan (and a Reaganite like Bader) believed they were accurate.
5. A slight exaggeration; in 1982, the comic strip Doonesbury portrayed a distraught EPA official crawling out onto his ledge in protest of ‘dismantling the whole enforcement team.’ Shortly thereafter, the real-life EPA administrator, Anne Gorsuch, issued a memo to all EPA employees protesting “windowsill politics.”
6. Associated Press, “Furniture Spending Questioned,” March 18, 1980.
7. Frank Corimer, “Government Waste? Here Is a Perfect Example,” Associated Press, July 19, 1979.
Product details
- Publisher : PRH Christian Publishing
- Publication date : June 3, 2014
- Language : English
- Print length : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0770436528
- ISBN-13 : 978-0770436520
- Item Weight : 7.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.19 x 0.62 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #928,313 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #451 in Political Humor (Books)
- #895 in Parody
- #1,037 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Jim Geraghty is National Review’s senior political correspondent and a columnist for the Washington Post.
In 2019, Jim made presentations about foreign disinformation campaigns on social media and tools to counter propaganda to the Austrian National Defense Academy, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the University of Vienna, and the U.S. Embassy to Austria.
Jim was named CPAC’s “Journalist of the Year” in 2015 and also won the Young Conservatives Coalition’s William F. Buckley award that year. He writes the “Morning Jolt” newsletter and contributes to NRO’s Corner blog. He’s the author of Heavy Lifting with Cam Edwards, the novel The Weed Agency (a Washington Post bestseller) and Voting to Kill.
He appears regularly on CNN, CNN International and Fox News’ MediaBuzz as well as other cable news programs, and co-hosts a pop culture podcast with Mickey White.
Jim spent two years in Ankara, Turkey working as a foreign correspondent and studying anti-Americanism, democratization, Islam, Middle East politics, and U.S. diplomacy efforts, appearing in The Philadelphia Inquirer, The New York Sun, The Washington Times and The Washington Examiner. He covered violent protests over the Muhammad cartoons, avian flu outbreaks, and Pope Benedict XVI’s visit to Ankara. He also covered national elections in Great Britain and Germany, and has reported from Egypt, Italy, Israel, Spain, and Jordan over the years.
In 2008, Best Life magazine called Jim one of “the 10 most important voices to listen to this election cycle.” His “Kerry Spot” blog was awarded for having the “Best Political Dirt” by WashingtonPost.com in 2004, and the London Times praised his “killer insight” in that election cycle.
He lives in the spider-infested neighborhood nicknamed "Authenticity Woods" in Fairfax County, Virginia.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book humorous, describing it as a fun read about a depressing subject, and appreciate its readability and writing style, comparing it to Forrest Gump. Moreover, the book receives positive feedback for its enlightening content, believable characters, and political context, with one customer noting its accurate portrayal of government bureaucracy. However, the fiction aspect receives mixed reactions, with some finding it too close to the truth. Additionally, customers express concerns about the book's efficiency.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book humorous, describing it as a funniest sad book that is better to laugh than cry, with one customer noting how the author artfully uses humor.
"...lastly, the shift toward an entitlement mentality, all provide abundant humorous material. There is, a chuckle on every page...." Read more
"...That's how I was able to read this intelligent and entertaining book without getting morbidly depressed by the culture of waste and inefficiency..." Read more
"...First, the book's strengths need to be stated. Much of it is indeed funny, and it's also somewhat even-handed despite its unashamedly conservative..." Read more
"If you read this book, it will make you laugh. Geraghty's well written characters are often amusing and his pop-culture references are spot-on...." Read more
Customers find the book highly readable, describing it as a joy to read and well worth the time, with one customer noting it's perfect beach reading for conservatives.
"...Written by a former National Review columnist, this book sets a high standard for successfully integrating numerous social and political issues in a..." Read more
"...is there, but the humor and the humanity in the writing make it a joy to read. Definitely recommend it." Read more
"...For anyone who intends to work in the government, this is a good book to read to set your expectations for how things actually work...." Read more
"...This is a work of fiction. Keep saying that while reading this excellent and easy read...." Read more
Customers find the book enlightening, describing it as an eye-opening tale that teaches while entertaining.
"...wit, but for a first foray into satire and farce, this is a masterful accomplishment...." Read more
"...Review columnist, this book sets a high standard for successfully integrating numerous social and political issues in a single, hilarious yarn...." Read more
"...That's how I was able to read this intelligent and entertaining book without getting morbidly depressed by the culture of waste and inefficiency..." Read more
"...to know what goes on in DC, and I got the well-written and knowledgeable part. Unfortunately, I didn't get the satire part...." Read more
Customers find the book well written and easy to read, with one customer noting it reads like Forrest Gump.
"...On the other hand, this work is going to be more comprehensible to American readers, since it shows how Sir Humphrey's techniques, designed for the..." Read more
"...; Like Trollope, he understands the working of government, writes developed, believable characters, and is just too funny...." Read more
"...someone in a position to know what goes on in DC, and I got the well-written and knowledgeable part...." Read more
"...Keep saying that while reading this excellent and easy read...." Read more
Customers appreciate the character development in the book, finding them believable, with one customer noting the intelligent antihero and another highlighting the exceptional wit in the writing.
"...The two works share a very entertaining flaw: The antihero is so intelligent, so brilliant in how he runs circles around his detractors, that it's..." Read more
"...to readers wanting an insider's view of Washington DC, told with exceptional wit and raucous humor...." Read more
"...he understands the working of government, writes developed, believable characters, and is just too funny...." Read more
"If you read this book, it will make you laugh. Geraghty's well written characters are often amusing and his pop-culture references are spot-on...." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's political context, with one review noting its accurate portrayal of federal government bureaucracy, while another describes it as an entertaining look at how Washington politics operates.
"...not as zany as most of Buckley's, but it is more grounded in the political reality of Washington...." Read more
"...The broader story is how shifts in political power, crazes and movements, personnel turnover, budgetary strategies and turf battles, impact the AIS..." Read more
"...the "Palliser Chronicles." Like Trollope, he understands the working of government, writes developed, believable characters, and is just too..." Read more
"...The Weed Agency” is funny, enlightening and an entertaining look at how Washington politics operates...." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the book's fiction elements, with some finding it plausible and too close to the truth, while others note it is too close to reality.
"...The people that live and breathe in this narrative are, in that sense, real...." Read more
"...Story works fine if you just read it without looking up a thing)...." Read more
"...The illustration of the bureaucratic imperative was all too chillingly realistic." Read more
"...What makes these examples amusing is that they are all too outrageous to be real...." Read more
Customers find the book inefficient.
"...plus years, and how it manages to survive and expand despite its dubious utility, and frank ineptitude- even though "budget hawks" were in..." Read more
"...The author artfully uses humor to illustrate how inefficient, wasteful and mediocre our government can be." Read more
"...experience, even if it is depressing to think of the waste and inefficiencies that comprise our government. We laugh because it's better than crying!" Read more
"A typical governent waste of money and bureaucratic boondooogle." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2019Format: KindleVerified PurchaseDuring the Carter administration, the peanut farmer become president, a man very well acquainted with weeds, created the Agency of Invasive Species (AIS) within the Department of Agriculture to cope with the menace. Well, not really—the agency which occupies centre stage in this farce is fictional but, as the author notes in the preface, the Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds, the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, the Federal Interagency Committee on Invasive Terrestrial Animals and Pathogens, and the National Invasive Species Council of which they are members along with a list of other agencies, all do exist. So while it may seem amusing that a bankrupt and over-extended government would have an agency devoted to weeds, in fact that real government has an entire portfolio of such agencies, along with, naturally, a council to co-ordinate their activities.
The AIS has a politically appointed director, but the agency had been run since inception by Administrative Director Adam Humphrey, career civil service, who is training his deputy, Jack Wilkins, new to the civil service after a frustrating low-level post in the Carter White House, in the ways of the permanent bureaucracy and how to deal with political appointees, members of congress, and rival agencies. Humphrey has an instinct for how to position the agency's mission as political winds shift over the decades: during the Reagan years as American agriculture's first line of defence against the threat of devastation by Soviet weeds, at the cutting edge of information technology revolutionising citizens' interaction with government in the Gingrich era, and essential to avert even more disastrous attacks on the nation after the terrorist attacks in 2001.
Humphrey and Wilkins are masters of the care and feeding of congressional allies, who are rewarded with agency facilities in their districts, and neutralising the occasional idealistic budget cutter who wishes to limit the growth of the agency's budget or, horror of horrors, abolish it.
We also see the agency through the eyes of three young women who arrived at the agency in 1993 suffused with optimism for “reinventing government” and “building a bridge to the twenty-first century”. While each of them—Lisa, hired in the communications office; Jamie, an event co-ordinator; and Ava, a technology systems analyst—were well aware that their positions in the federal bureaucracy were deep in the weeds, they believed they had the energy and ambition to excel and rise to positions where they would have the power to effect change for the better.
Then they began to actually work within the structure of the agency and realise what the civil service actually was. Thomas Sowell has remarked that the experience in his life which transformed him from being a leftist (actually, a Marxist) to a champion of free markets and individual liberty was working as a summer intern in 1960 in a federal agency. He says that after experiencing the civil service first-hand, he realised that whatever were the problems of society that concerned him, government bureaucracy was not the solution. Lisa, Jamie, and Ava all have similar experiences, and react in different ways. Ava decides she just can't take it any more and is tempted by a job in the middle of the dot com boom. Her experience is both entertaining and enlightening.
Even the most obscure federal agency has the power to mess up on a colossal scale and wind up on the front page of the Washington Post and the focus of a congressional inquest. So it was to be for the AIS, when an ill wind brought a threat to agriculture in the highly-visible districts of powerful members of congress. All the bureaucratic and political wiles of the agency had to be summoned to counter the threat and allow the agency to continue to do what such organisations do best: nothing.
Jim Geraghty is a veteran reporter, contributing editor, and blogger at National Review; his work has appeared in a long list of other publications. His reportage has always been characterised by a dry wit, but for a first foray into satire and farce, this is a masterful accomplishment. It is as funny as some of the best work of Christopher Buckley, and that's about as good as contemporary political humour gets. Geraghty's plot is not as zany as most of Buckley's, but it is more grounded in the political reality of Washington. One of the most effective devices in the book is to describe this or that absurdity and then add a footnote documenting that what you've just read actually exists, or that an outrageous statement uttered by a character was said on the record by a politician or bureaucrat.
Much of this novel reads like an American version of the British sitcom Yes Minister (Margaret Thatcher's favourite television programme), and although the author doesn't mention it in the author's note or acknowledgements, I suspect that the master civil servant's being named “Humphrey” is an homage to that series. Sharp-eyed readers will discover another oblique reference to Yes Minister in the entry for November 2012 in the final chapter.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 22, 2014Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseThe book's antihero, Adam Humphrey, is clearly based on uberbureaucrat Sir Humphrey Appleby from the long-running British TV series Yes Minister. The two works share a very entertaining flaw: The antihero is so intelligent, so brilliant in how he runs circles around his detractors, that it's frequently difficult not to admire him and root for his inevitable victory in securing more money for the agency, no matter how ill-advised such a request actually is.
Honestly, the nominally good guys, the people we should be rooting for in their efforts to eliminate government waste and mismanagement, are not nearly as vivid or entertaining.
I enjoyed the book and gobbled it up in a day or so. I deduct a star for being so obviously a derivative work, but at least the author is considerate enough to admit the connection on page 255, in a way sufficiently subtle that only Yes Minister fans will notice it. On the other hand, this work is going to be more comprehensible to American readers, since it shows how Sir Humphrey's techniques, designed for the British system of government, are alive and well in the USA.
If this review has made you want to visit the original, here you go: http://www.amazon.com/The-Complete-Minister-Jonathan-Lynn/dp/0563206659/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1403403018&sr=8-2&keywords=yes+minister
- Reviewed in the United States on August 23, 2016Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseI've just finished reading "The Weed Agency" (2014) by Jim Geraghty, and I cannot say enough nice things about it. The subtitle, "A Comic Tale of Federal Bureaucracy Without Limits," conveys a lot of what this novel is about, but there is much more going on here that should be of interest to readers wanting an insider's view of Washington DC, told with exceptional wit and raucous humor.
Written by a former National Review columnist, this book sets a high standard for successfully integrating numerous social and political issues in a single, hilarious yarn. There are characters that we recognize and care about, told against the factual backdrop of Washington political history, beginning with the Carter administration and its disasters, and ending fairly recently. This historical background -- filtered through the daily cares and concerns of the Agency of Invasive Species (AIS), its administrative director, Adam Humphrey, and his chosen successor, Wilkins -- anchors and supports a Pickwickian cast of players, and treats us to a long-view of the political process.
The broader story is how shifts in political power, crazes and movements, personnel turnover, budgetary strategies and turf battles, impact the AIS in different and unpredictable ways. The Clinton scandal, the dot-com start-up bubble (complete with messianic visionary), and lastly, the shift toward an entitlement mentality, all provide abundant humorous material. There is, a chuckle on every page.
There are also supporting factual footnotes scattered throughout -- as if to remind us that what may appear to be ridiculous on the page, pales in comparison with Washington's surplus of human frailty and foibles.
If this is an angry critique of federal bureaucracy, the acrimony is well hidden and smothered in the arms of a mother that loves and cares about the American political process. The people that live and breathe in this narrative are, in that sense, real. Very little feels contrived, because, as the blurb says, "You'll want to believe this book is fiction, but in your heart you know so much of it -- too much of it -- is all too hilariously real." In this way, it is a lot like Charles Dickens' early humorous writing.
Middle-managers will immediately recognize and appreciate the administrative director's mentoring lectures to Wilkins on Washington's inner workings, strategic appraisals, and analysis. By way of example, the book offers ways to deal with superiors and rivals. It really is about politics, and how sadly wrong-headed it can be, most of the time. The book is stocked full with snappy come-backs and witty observations.
But what is missing in terms of a theoretical sociology of bureaucracy can be easily found in the tenets of Zygmunt Bauman's "Modernity and the Holocaust" (1989). Here, Bauman lays out in chilling detail the laws governing bureaucratic hierarchies, and the cognitive impairments so apparent in Geraghty. For both, in their own way, the result is the tragic loss of humanity, but only "The Weed Agency" gives us the opportunity to laugh at it.
Top reviews from other countries
- paulcollingsReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 17, 2015
4.0 out of 5 stars The Weed agency.
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseIt will never be considered a great book. But it was an easy read and funny because it tells a tale of bureaucracy that we know is true but always denied.
Sadly it could have been a book written by a whistle blower. If you like your conspiracy to be true. This is the n
Book for you.